Category: Management

  • Association Member Engagement Mountain

    Association Member Engagement Mountain

    Written by Dan Varroney

     Dan at Potomac Consulting has hit this right on the head, we fully believe and recommend to clients that the engagement puzzle be solved so that true growth can be achieved that is sustainable and manageable, not just a quick promotional bump in the numbers. This shows why . . .

    It’s important that in this day and age that Associations not “leave well enough alone.” The Stay or Go Imperative could impact an Association’s financial health and well being. If membership is a distraction instead of ROI, Corporations vote with their feet and instead invest in a different solution.

    Yes,  Corporations have smaller corporate staff, in some instances one executive may wear multiple hats. However, if this executive makes the dues decision, then a strategy or a change is  necessary.

    Read the Tea Leaves

    Companies look for the connection to business objectives as part of their membership evaluation process. If these connections don’t exist, it’s difficult for any Association to execute an effective strategy to engage members. Metrics are like tea leaves they both paint a picture and they tell a story.

    If Associations observe that conference attendance is equal or less to prior years, educational meetings and fly-in attendance is significantly lower, and member retention is down for three consecutive years,  it is time for an intervention. The marketplace could also signal one or more of the following: 

    • Negative view of the culture and overall effectiveness of an Association.
    • The Association is perceived as not being as impactful in educational, policy or advocacy programs.
    • Other solutions including coalitions, conference providers or other Association programs deliver greater value.

    Never Hit The Panic Button

    Associations should embrace the challenge and convert the situation into a strategic opportunity. When diagnosing, member participation and revenue fall-off rebuild the path to engagement: one company at a time, obtain clarity on business and policy objectives, and understand what members really must achieve from participation achieve.

    CEO’s can keep in mind that success and failure are never final, the road forward offers hope, and a more definitive path to member engagement.

    Develop Data Driven Strategies

    Associations need to build a data set to help them understand why participation and revenues have fallen.  However, it’s key to put heavier weight on relationships; in a complex world the human connection matters. One member at a time, collect the following information:

    • Is the Association perceived as staff or member driven?
    • Does participation help executives achieve company business objectives?
    • Why do executives participate in other Associations or Coalitions?
    • How important is networking?
    • Would Social Media engagement on platforms such as LinkedIn reflect an attractive alternative?
    • Are educational and or certification programs relevant to career advancement?

    While Associations may develop additional or different questions, these open the door to constructive dialogue with disengaged members. Tally the responses, create internal task forces of senior managers and key staff, develop solutions and new strategies, assign performance metrics and then execute.

    Association Member Engagement Mountain

    For Association CEO’s who have or who are looking into the abyss, there is light at the end of the tunnel. An Association Executive confronting the worst dues loss in decades once reported record gains in member participation, advocacy effectiveness and revenue growth. Stepping back, building an Association wide member focus with data driven strategies proved to be a year long process worthy of the effort.

    Yes, the participation, retention and growth outcomes were record highs but the data really reflected stronger member connectivity.

    Climbing the Member Engagement Mountain is vital and necessary for every Association. It can also be the determining strategy helping Associations achieve revenue growth.

    How does your Association drive Member Engagement?

  • Customer Service is Still Your Best Marketing Weapon

    Customer Service is Still Your Best Marketing Weapon

    I’ve traveled all over the country for years for business and personal reasons, and have a Louis-Vuitton sized trunk full of travel nightmare stories as a result, most involving air travel, but not all. I have also had some wonderful experiences, largely due to the people I’ve met or interacted with along the way.

    Recently I was traveling for business and collected a huge, whale of a tale to add to my collection. I was going to Chicago for a meeting, landing in our favorite Midwestern hub airport, for just a few hours, and then intended to return home that afternoon, both on, notably enough, United airlines.

    Now, as a matter of full disclosure, I have traveled to Chicago on United for years, and have had only a handful of bad experiences, most were minor in nature. I’ve recently had friends and relatives traveling for pleasure take United and experienced horrific treatment, unconscionable delays, poor service and extended travails and battles with management. I can’t count those as part of my story-luggage, but I should have kept them in mind when booking this particular trip.

    I boarded at BWI, on time, with no significant incident (beyond being treated like a criminal by TSA, but that’s another story for another day). Flight arrived at O’Hare without incident, but promptly upon hitting the ground, the ordeal began. Apparently, FAA regulations (and I haven’t looked this up), prohibit planes from entering the ramp area if there is any lightning within five miles of the airport. This was news to me, having taxied and deplaned in some horrific storms in the past without incident or mishap, and having been on planes that were struck by lightning. Their feeling was that sitting on the pavement fifty feet away from the building was safe, but not fifty feet closer to the building. Is the pavement different?

    After 40 minutes of delay waiting for the lightning to move a little further away, we deplaned and I went on my way to my meeting.

    My return flight was scheduled to board at 7:48 PM that same day. At 1:46 PM I get an e-mail from United saying my flight was cancelled, and that I had been re-booked on a flight at 11:48. . . AM the following morning, that connected through Newark airport and would have me arriving at home at approximately 6:30 PM, nearly 20 hours after my initial arrival time! I had no room, no luggage, no anything for an overnight stay, including a charging cable for my phone. No one bothered to call and ask if this booking was satisfactory to me, or even possible!

    Rather than try to negotiate this issue through a swiftly expiring mobile device, I called my office and had someone book me on another, available, direct, one-way flight leaving at 9 PM that evening, but landing at DCA, 90 minutes away from my destination airport where my car was parked, at my own expense. I figured I could grab a light-rail train and get to the other airport and pick up my car, and drive home from there – total delay time roughly 5 hours – not a tragedy by any stretch, especially compared to waiting until the next day.

    I received a total of 8 e-mail messages from United, alerting me to delays, cancellations and re-bookings as the fluid situation changed, all caused by a little rain in the center of the country. In the end, my original flight had been cancelled and re-booked three times, and my arrival time had extended until 6 PM on Friday, for what was intended to be a quick two hour meeting and return the same afternoon. My one-way flight, when it eventually took off, left at 10:30 PM, got me to DCA at 2AM local time, and left me with an additional 90 minutes of driving to get home, arriving at roughly 4 AM, 23 hours after I had set off on my journey.

    The following day, I drove back to BWI to pick up my car, and stopped in to the terminal to try and untangle the thicket of cancellations, re-bookings and ticket changes. The ticket agent I spoke with had no power to take any action to refund or cancel my still existing flight, despite the obvious fact that I clearly wasn’t going to be on the flight from Chicago if I was standing in front of her in Baltimore! She called a supervisor of some sort, who after no less than 6 re-tellings, however inaccurate, of my story, agreed to refund my expense for the half of the original flight I wasn’t going to use. They refused to acknowledge any responsibility for the delay, the need to purchase an additional ticket, or to refund the price of the newly purchased ticket, any meals, or the two hotel rooms I had booked, based on their poor track record of flights actually leaving the airport that day, one of which got used by a colleague trying to do the same thing I was – get out of Chicago! No one seemed the least bit remorseful, apologetic or even willing to recognize that there had been a problem.

    Now the marketing moral of the story. If they had treated me like a person, disclosed information about the nature and duration of the problem, asked how I would have liked it handled, admitted that they had not fulfilled their end of the contract, or wanted in any way to treat me like a valued customer, I wouldn’t have written this, and then sent the link around the world, spreading the negative story globally for all potential flyers to see and read. Not only will my experience preclude me from flying on their airline again the foreseeable future, but I will tell this story to anyone who will listen and try and persuade them to do the same. I’m now a REVERSE EVANGELIST for their company, the exact opposite of what their corporate branding and marketing department has spent hundreds of millions of dollars to achieve. All it would have taken was one person from the company to send me a message saying, “we’re sorry you were inconvenienced, call this number and we’ll see what we can do to help you out.” For the lack of that sentiment, a customer, and possibly many others, was lost. For lack of customers, an airline was lost.

    Good luck, United.

  • Professional Membership Has Great Value for the Member and the Organization

    Professional Membership Has Great Value for the Member and the Organization

    The new revolution of Social Media and its marketing potential has been one of the most heavily written about topics in recent years. The success of Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and a host of others has been postulated to stem from a need for human interaction in an increasingly isolating world. Is it really a cure, or is it another contributor to that isolation?

    There are some obvious drawbacks to the use of social media, including the threat of loss of privacy; the anonymous and random nature of the “friend” phenomenon; and the fact that there are a huge number of valuable, brilliant people in the world who have no concept of these systems and don’t participate in them at all, and likely never will. They are too busy leading real, enriching, empowered lives outside the cyber realm, interacting with people face-to-face.

    Social media is more likely a ready replacement for the old-fashioned method of meeting new people, seeking out like individuals with common interests, traits, social circumstances and desires – networking events. Meetings, conferences, charities, and professional and business trade associations were the centers of the business and social universe. Members joined to meet new people, those of similar interest to their own. They were from similar backgrounds, similar socioeconomic circumstances, (mildly) similar income and often depending upon the type of organization, geographically similar. They were by definition, a group.

    Some groups are more social than others. Neighborhood associations, fraternal and community, civic organizations, like Optimists, Rotary Clubs, Shriners, Civitans, Elks Lodges, Oddfellows, Masons and such are often built around a charity or fundraising for a specific cause or issue, but are largely social in nature. Professional and trade associations are more businesslike, especially the latter, which has corporations as members, but uses individuals as volunteers. However there are strong social components, including an annual meeting, sometimes a secondary meeting focused on specific components of their industry, continuing education opportunities throughout the year, and of course committee work and volunteer projects to recruit new members, maintain dues and enrollment renewal, and other fundraising projects to keep the organization running and viable. One of the truly valuable benefits to belonging to such an organization is this social component, and the benefits are myriad.

    To form true business relationships, one must find familiarity and common ground. One way to do that is through such business-related organizations where some of the screening has already been done and the common interest is displayed up front. One such organization whose reason for being is to help promote this type of professional interaction is Sales and Marketing Executives International (SMEI). It is a 74-year-old international group with 10,000 members in 30 countries and throughout the United States, whose sole reason for joining is to meet other top business professionals in their sector and enhance their professional knowledge and standing. SMEI offers a certification program for Sales, one for Marketing, and a Management certificate, recognized internationally as a sign of professionalism and excellence. Meeting frequency and purpose varies by chapter, but all have a business relationship-forming function of some sort, based on five founding principles: Professional Standards and Identification, Continuing Education, Sharing Knowledge, Assist Students, Support the Free Enterprise System. Benefits of membership include professional recognition and respect, enlarged professional sphere of influence, strong professional network and enhanced community and professional outreach.

    Those benefits mirror many other organizations’ benefits, but few are stated so clearly and succinctly, and lived by the membership so obviously. Not only does the individual member benefit to a great degree from their participation, but the organization benefits from the aggregate efforts of professionals at this level, working on their projects in their “native” turf – sales and marketing. This is true of few organizations of this type – typically the officers are elected based on popularity first and competence second or beyond. They may have an accountant as treasurer if they’re lucky, or an attorney as President for a year or more, but that’s often the extent of it.

    Professional trade associations with professional staff’s who specialize in Association management are an entirely different animal. These organizations are typically well-run, offer great benefits to their corporate or individual members, the principal of which varies from group to group, but usually include some sort of government lobbying and public marketing for the industry, education of the industry, standards and practices for the industry, statistics for the industry, and occasionally innovation and regulation within the industry. The social component as an adjunct to those benefits comes in the form of an annual meeting, some sort of recognition for outstanding performance within the group or industry, a commercial exhibition of some sort, continuing education opportunities, and networking as a byproduct of all of the above.

    The most important thing you can do to build your personal and professional reputation is to be active in your own industry, and that means joining and most importantly engaging in activities sponsored and structured by your industry associations. Find a way to justify the value of your dues payment, and the easiest way to do that is to get involved – this is truly an environment where you reap what you sow. Join a committee, work your way onto the board, pick a project and give it some time, effort and commitment – new business and an expanded sphere of influence are the smallest possible returns, and those are valuable indeed.

    Based on these types of organizations, the electronic version doesn’t even come close to the power of a personally interacted business relationship. Human beings sense elements of each other’s personality through a number of different channels, including the interpretation of body language, clothing choice, vocal inflection and word choice. Interaction with others on a face-to-face basis is essential to forming fully informed business relationships. All that meta information is lost in the cyber realm, leaving you with just the filtered choices of text and images to work with when forming conclusions about this person’s character, intent and sincerity.

    The next time you’re filing your friends on Facebook, or counting your connections on LinkedIn, ask yourself if you’d associate personally or professionally with all of those people if it meant meeting them face-to-face in a professional or social situation. Would you invite them into your home, meet them at a local hotel for dinner, recommend them for a job, refer them to your banker or broker? If the answer to any of these is no, are they really productive, solid, reciprocal relationships that foster business, or are they more like artificially garnered acquaintances that know more about you than you might like?

    If you found this valuable and thought-provoking, don’t forget to pick up your copy of “The Marketing Doctor’s Survival Notes”

  • Are These 12 Roadblocks Stopping Your Valuable Trade Show Leads?

    Are These 12 Roadblocks Stopping Your Valuable Trade Show Leads?

    Unfortunately, too many waste these valiant efforts, because they fall down on managing their trade show leads.  That’s because there are more hidden roadblocks than they realize, obstacles to getting the full value from their leads.

    So let’s bring those roadblocks out into the light.  I believe the list below includes the 12 most common obstacles to effective lead management – how many of these are issues do you need to address?

    1. Incomplete lead management process
    2. No single person responsible for the entire process
    3. No consultation with sales about what information needs to be gathered at the show
    4. No training of trade show booth staffers about what makes a qualified lead, how to record lead quality
    5. Qualifying information from leads is not captured with a lead card or a lead retrieval system
    6. If complete information is captured, it is not conveyed to the appropriate sales person after the show
    7. Slow, incomplete, or non-existent lead fulfillment
    8. No computer system or customer relationship management software in place to facilitate lead management
    9. Lead fulfillment packages not chosen nor prepared in advance
    10. Lead fulfillment is generic and does not respond specifically to what individual attendees asked about while visiting your trade show exhibit.
    11. No one pre-assigned to data enter and fulfill the large quantity of leads
    12. No accountability for sales people to follow up on leads within a specific, short period of time after the show

    Any of these sound familiar?  Fixing this will take a team effort, including your sales, marketing, and information technology teams.  Get them all in a room and work to knock down these obstacles. For motivation, bring to the meeting a pile of your latest trade show leads, a spreadsheet of the costs of your show, and the highest level exec you can get that these people all report to.

    Then you can work to avoid all 12 of these obstacles and create a smoother lead management process that gives your company the full potential value of your trade show leads.

  • Big Brands Use Big Data To Engage Customers

    Big Brands Use Big Data To Engage Customers

    Recent economic indicators describe a consumer climate that is different than virtually any in recent history, and consumer product and service businesses are having a tough time closing sales and encouraging sales traffic, both brick-and-mortar and online. This enforced stinginess on the part of consumers is wide-spread but not universal. Some products fly off the shelves and some companies are wildly profitable, while the majority seem to be pushing a rock uphill.

     

    Consumers are caught in a vicious cycle economically, have been since 2008. Profit is down on a per unit basis, write-downs and charge offs notwithstanding. Employment is down from knee-jerk reactive cost-cutting measures trying to stem the tide of red ink, the unemployed numbering in the many hundreds of thousands, and the underemployed doubling that. Equities in general have been stumbling along the bottom of the trough for the last two years, with a 3% growth number putting them back at break-even since before the crash. Spending is down, savings are flat, foreclosures are restarting their relentless march, debt is way too high, both consumer and governmental, and consumers are cautiously nervous.

    For retailers, this is the perfect storm of nightmares. Consumers are too scared to make those bigger purchases due to income uncertainty. Retailers won’t or can’t hire due to low margin, and can’t add jobs, reducing the unemployment numbers. Investors get lousy returns, and therefore can’t invest in riskier companies, so they can’t expand and add jobs. Consumers who have jobs are unsure they will keep them, but are doing the work of three and trying to keep their own head above water, cutting back on discretionary purchases. So, as a marketer, how do you break through the fear and engage consumers?

    In a word, “Trust”.

    If you scan the list of most profitable or growing consumer product corporations*[1], you’ll notice that they don’t have a common theme in terms of product offering, or price point or position in the marketplace, although they all tend to be number 1-4 in their category. The common thread among them won’t likely jump out at you from the list itself, but if you dig a little deeper, the theme becomes clear. These growing, smart, stable companies have been conservative in their growth plans, aggressive in defense and development of their brand, and firm believers in keeping their brand promise, leading to outstanding customer loyalty. They make products that people want and need no matter what their economic circumstances, and maintain loyalty through consistent quality assurance, product development speed and flexibility. In short, they give their customers what they want, and have done so long enough and consistently enough to have garnered long-term customer loyalty, and more importantly, trust.

    As marketers, we can’t often affect many of the attributes listed above that these firms have in common, but the few that we can, need to be the very best expression of the brand promise to establish that trust. We can’t affect QA directly, for instance, but we can certainly pitch the promotions to the correct consumer level and keep public perception on the right aspects of the product if QA is spotty or suspect. Product development is sometimes seen as Indian territory for the marketing department, but in these high-profit companies, our studies show that marketers are deeply involved in not only accumulating consumer data to feed product development, but provide assistance and expertise on consumer preferences, brand extension and alignment, and even assessing product features and elements, to be sure they meet consumer preference and demand. Perhaps this characteristic above all others may be the critical element in the continuing romance between these companies and their customers. In almost every case, companies that get the marketing staff involved early in the development process and have a defined process for creating, developing and launching new products are more nimble, responsive and profitable than those who simply launch and market products after the fact.

    That’s great for companies that create a range of new products regularly or update their flagship product routinely. But what about some of those firms who have been riding the same product year after year? How do they engage their customers and engender such loyalty to the brand?

    Many established and older brands that have let research and development languish, either through lack of resources or short-sighted thinking, find that they need to create or establish a new angle, a new application, a new extension of the existing product to create interest from new customers and renew interest from existing customers. Clorox might be an example of this, especially 10-15 years ago. Household bleach is a staple, has few innovations or moving parts, and aside from updating the package, and not much of that, it is basically unchanged since the 50s. Recently, they have innovated within the category, created new applications for the product and formed partnerships with other products to bundle or reinforce their products. Adding their product to other cleaning products gets the brand into households that might not welcome them otherwise, and sets or reinforces the expectation that bleach is an enhancer of cleanliness.

    Making the product “portable” in the form of a stain removing stick was a recent innovation that was launched in response to consumers’ increased mobility and need for instant gratification. Yet despite it’s age, Clorox continues to move off the shelves in predictable and growing fashion and avoid becoming a commodity, despite strong shots from competitors, generic versions manufactured overseas, and reduced profitability from price increases on raw materials and distribution challenges. A marketing team that can come up with a new angle for a 50+ year old product is a strong, flexible one indeed. What has kept them going is strong customer loyalty, and trust in the quality and integrity of the product to perform as advertised day in and day out over many years.

    But engaging customers doesn’t always mean product innovation, or even marketing innovation. Sometimes it has more to do with taking the appropriate approach based on customer’s expectations. One of the companies on this list, Harley Davidson, is a champion at delivering it’s message in the most appropriate medium for it’s audience’s digestion. But that hasn’t kept them from being innovative in order to engage the customer. Over a century old, Harley’s target customer is also getting older, and that demographic is populated by notoriously slow adopters of new technology. Harley does much of it’s marketing through the dealer channel and through event and sponsorship presence. They host rallies, rides, and other gatherings of product users through an extensive network of dealers and repair facilities coast-to-coast, and know their customer well. They have a huge array of licensed products and aggressively protect their brand in each of these arrangements, selecting only the highest quality materials, workmanship and designs to put their name on. This is one of the most traditional marketing models out there, and it still works very well. You would not expect them to have a huge online presence or use internet resources extensively to reach a 50+ age audience. Yet they have taken advantage of the social media phenomenon to help spread their message via word of mouth among their vast network of customers, creating Twitter accounts, a strong presence on Facebook with nearly 2 million friends. Other efforts include each dealer’s own FB page and own website, all of which have access to the manufacturer’s site, news, product info, dealer locator and more, plus license holder sites. All of this is used to promote new products, showcase product innovation, and get customer feedback, monitoring the electronic conversation and reacting quickly to customer input, engendering even greater loyalty and trust. It’s the message, not the medium that counts.

    Engaging customers also has to do with relevance. Being relevant to your customers may seem like everyone’s goal, and indeed it might be, but these profitable companies seem to have it innately present in their corporate DNA. These companies constantly seek ways to enrich their customers’ lives, and find new ways to be part of them. Coach, Inc., might be a good example of this. The luxury brand has innovated a number of approaches to meeting the needs of its niche market’s need for upscale handbags and accessories, leveraging their brand strength over a series of related products. If you purchase a Coach bag, with its famous lifetime warrantee, and it’s likely you’ll be informed about other Coach accessories, and often buy them, with the assurance that each product, either direct manufacture or licensed, will be made with the same level of care and quality, and at the same price point in the market. If you are a Coach-level consumer, you make it your business to show it, by buying the branded products that prove it. This elite, exclusive approach works very well for them, as it ramps up the relevance in their customer’s lives.

    As marketers, we have a huge volume of information and research data available to us regarding consumer trends, preferences, and behavior. It is up to us to responsibly use this data on OUR customers, to craft innovative, trustworthy, relevant outreach messaging to engage our customers to create brand trust, and drive sales and profits to where they need to be. Most of that trust and relevancy comes from the correct and appropriate use of that data to craft messaging that resonates with the target consumer. Transparency, honesty, relevance and trustworthiness are key to achieving these goals, and you can see the results of such activity reflected in the marketplace and the bottom line.

    If you found this insightful (or frightful) be sure to pick up your copy of “The Marketing Doctor’s Survival Notes”

    [1] List compiled by Seeking Alpha, copyright 2010
  • Google This: What It Means When A Brand Becomes A Verb

    Google This: What It Means When A Brand Becomes A Verb

    I thought readers would appreciate this – I’m as guilty as anyone of using these verbisms, especially being close to the inside at Xerox and a couple of the other larger brands in a couple of industries. Its interesting to see the differences in which one gets picked for this “honor” – we text and call people, and we phone people, we don’t iPhone them, no matter that they are the market leader. But when the telephone was not the only device that performed this function in the early days of communication technology, the telephone won the market and, became the generic term. Kleenex also experienced this as the dominant player in the disposable tissue market, but we still blow our noses or wipe up, we don’t “kleenex” our noses. No verbism, but still the market leader becomes the default term for the category.

    TiVo. FedEx. Taser. Velcro. Superglue. Sometimes consumers latch onto a brand and make it a verb–the question is whether it helps or hurts a brand.

    We FaceTime and Skype but we generally don’t Facebook or YouTube. We Google but we don’t Bing (at least not yet). We Rollerblade but we don’t Slinky. In past years, we would Xerox but would never Polaroid. Why are some popular brands or products used as verbs in our everyday conversation and others not?

    It’s an interesting question and there are opposing sides in the business world about whether “verbifying” (which is a verbified word in itself) a brand or product is a good thing or not. On the one hand, the marketers tend to believe it’s the ultimate compliment and demonstrates a personal connection between consumer and brand. The intellectual property attorneys, on the other hand, usually contend that using a product or brand name this way risks what is termed “genericide,” (as Dave Barry used to say, “I’m not making this up…”) meaning losing the legal power of a trademark. Xerox, for example, for several years apparently ran a campaign with publishers asking them to not use the name “Xerox” as a verb when the generic term “photo copy” was the intended meaning. A much referenced 2009 New York Times article describes the opposing views.

    TiVo. FedEx. Taser. Velcro. Superglue. Sometimes we consumers just latch onto a dominant brand and verbify it with no mind or care about whether the company wants us to or not. But it’s not clear why this happens to some products but not to others, even if they have similar product characteristics. Why do many people use the verb “Photoshop” (a product by Adobe) to mean any type of digital image manipulation but we don’t use “Word” (a product by Microsoft) as a verb to mean any type of word processing?

    Technically, the etymologists refer to the practice of verbing as “anthimeria,” which means a functional shift or conversion of word use, and it’s not a new phenomenon. Shakespeare was a serial verber, for instance. It can be creative and clever but in the business world it is abused and can become buzzword-speak. We ballpark, we partner, we value-add, eyeball, fast track, leverage, and we green-light. And in meetings we flip chart. But the line must be drawn somewhere. People using “dialogue” as a verb, for instance, should be formally reprimanded and the use of “architect” as a verb should be grounds for termination.

    Oh, sorry about the little rant. We were talking about brands being verbified and perhaps the first brand to do that consciously as part of its marketing strategy is Simoniz, the car wax. Back in the 1920s or ’30s the company’s tagline was “Motorist wise, Simoniz” and posters and ads from that period would exhort car owners to “Simoniz Now!” Similarly, having grown up in Michigan in the 1960s and 1970s, we would routinely use the brand Ziebart as both a noun and a verb (“Did you Ziebart your new car yet?”) to refer to any car rustproofing process (there’s that genericide bugaboo again).

    Sometimes companies’ efforts to “verb up” their brands fail or fizzle. Back in the 1970s I recall a campaign by the grocery chain Kroger which featured a jingle that sang out “Let’s go Krogering, Krogering, Krogering…” Let’s just say that ad was soon retired. And Yahoo several years ago asked people “Do you Yahoo?” Yahoo no longer asks that question and seems to be content to remain a noun.

    Brand verbification. What do you think will be the next one to enter our everyday lexicon–and does it help or hurt a brand?

    –Mike Hoban is a management consultant in his day job and can be contacted at business-at-large@sbcglobal.net.

    For more insights like these, be sure to pick up your copy of “The Marketing Doctor’s Survival Notes”

    [Image: Flickr user Isolino Ferreira]
  • Don’t Assume You Know Your Customers

    Don’t Assume You Know Your Customers

    Adam Richardson provides exquisite validation to Granite Partners’ research based marketing approach, in this well thought out blog post from Harvard Business Review. I couldn’t have said it better, so I bring it to you in it’s original form. Enjoy!

    Don’t Assume You Know Your Customers

    by Adam Richardson  |

    If the recent U.S. election taught us anything, it’s that you have to be careful assuming that others see the world the way you do. It’s very easy for any organization — political, commercial, not-for-profit — to get caught up in its own echo chamber of like-minded believers. After certain blogs, social media outlets, pundits, and talk shows whipped themselves into a self-reinforcing frenzy, many people were stunned by the election outcome. How could so many “experts” have gotten it so wrong?

    Shared enthusiasm and beliefs are valuable assets when pushing for a goal. In a business context, it’s vital that your employees are emotionally invested in your company’s vision. But there need to be checks and balances to make sure that the vision matches external reality, or you could be enthusiastically charging toward a similar shock. As the science fiction author Philip K. Dick once remarked, “Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn’t go away.”

    Getting an objective view of who you, as an organization, are trying to serve is critical, but it’s easier said than done.

    Most companies are the centers of their own universes. It’s a natural enough impression; after all, the products and services they offer are on their minds 24/7. The trap is in those companies deluding themselves into thinking that they are as important to their customers as they are to themselves. This is almost never the case. This delusion interferes with understanding customers and their needs, and frequently leads companies to talk to customers in ways that seem foreign or confusing.

    Financial services, the area that I work in now, is an example. It is rampant with confusing jargon and terminology, such as compound interest, ETFs, or the now infamous CDO, or collateralized debt obligation. A 2008 AARP study found that 79% of Americans think prescription drug instructions are easier to understand than materials from financial firms.

    But the financial services industry is not alone. Health care, wireless communications, real estate, information technology, and airlines are all major industries that consistently confuse and turn off their customers, leading to mistrust and disloyalty.

    Jargon in communication is just the surface of the problem. People who work in these industries day-to-day become infused with insider knowledge, techniques, and perspectives. After a while they forget their former lack of expertise and start to assume that everyone must also possess their knowledge — customers included.

    Employees are like hostages suffering from Stockholm syndrome — they take on the worldview of their employer and industry, and forget what it’s like to be a “regular” person without this specialized knowledge. Over time, employees start to talk mostly about tangible product features and become distanced from customer needs and benefits. Value propositions become more abstract and lose the naïve freshness of seeing of who customers really are and how they think, behave, and feel. It becomes increasingly difficult to see your company and industry as nonexpert outsiders do.

    How do we fix this? There are many research methods for better understanding customers, and you may be using them already: ethnographic research, focus groups, surveys, in-store intercepts, and so on. It’s also important to encourage employees to use competitors’ products, so they don’t develop tunnel vision. These are good and necessary, but you can have lots of data and still not see what it’s saying.

    There are two things that can stand in the way getting real insight:

    1. Admitting you may be wrong. If the organization isn’t willing to recognize that it’s not connecting with customers, dismisses indications that customers are confused or uninterested as “irrelevant outliers,” or avoids the message by shooting the messenger, then all the research in the world won’t help. Yes, there are times when an organization needs to be visionary and do things that at first most customers don’t get. Salesforce.com’s pioneering role in the nascent area of cloud computing services is an example of a company that was willing to lose some customers early on in pursuit of the bigger market later. But you have to be very confident in the size of the potential opportunity — and have the organizational fortitude — to pull of that big of a bet. Silicon Valley is littered with companies that made similar bets and failed because ultimately their proposed view of reality never came to align with that of their target customers’.

    2. Garbage in, garbage out. If you’re talking to too narrow of a sample (as was the case with many of the conservative pollsters) or framing research questions in ways that subtly pre-bias the answers, you could be inadvertently creating ever-better products for a shrinking audience. Don’t just meet with your best and current customers; get outside the echo chamber by meeting with ex-customers or people who have never been your customers but love your competitors and the upstart disruptors. (Yes, this often stresses out the sales team.) Years ago, when I was at Sun Microsystems, many at the company initially dismissed the cheap servers then being introduced by Dell and Compaq. Our loyal customers at large companies with massive IT budgets weren’t interested in these low quality machines. Not then, anyway. Sun couldn’t bring itself to lower its standards, and as a result, it ceded a huge part of the market to competitors moving up from the PC space.

    Don’t wait for a catastrophe to show you when you’ve become too caught up in your own hype. Make sure you are continuously seeking a more thorough and objective understanding of your customers, harness the fresh perspectives of new employees, and have the humility to recognize that your customers may have needs and lives beyond your company.

    For more on research and customerinsights, pick up your copy of “The Marketing Doctor’s Survival Guide”

  • Vertical Marketing Strategy – Are you Barking (Up the wrong tree) ?

    Vertical Marketing Strategy – Are you Barking (Up the wrong tree) ?

    Owen Ashby hit it on the head with this, we’ve seen this happen in bigger companies who are finding they need to spur new growth to keep up with the curve. Too perfect, no need for me to paraphrase, so here’s the original post in it’s entirety . . . enjoy!

    November 30 owenashby

    There was a time when all B2B marketing was horizontal and I don’t mean at the Christmas party (!).  Companies designed their value propositions to address needs they had identified in organisations of a certain size in a certain geography. There it stopped.

    Then someone sold the product or service to a Bank (for example). Everyone was delighted but not surprised because that particular bank had the exact needs the company had identified its product or service could address.

    Then some bright spark suggested that actually if they had one bank as a customer, surely other banks would “peer reference” (follow one another) and so the company should now try to sell to all banks.  To do that they would need a “Bank’s” sales force (and P&L) and probably a “Bank’s” proposition too. Of course with that would go a “Bank’s” sales target and the hope and dreams of the shareholders as  the company would surely be “the number 1 provider to Banks” before the year was out.

    Only it didn’t work out like that, by year two they had still only had one bank. The sales team had, had to focus elsewhere and the marketing team were at a loss. Which was annoying because the company had built its entire organisation like this. Now as well as a “bank” sales team it had a “retail” team (because they’d previously won a high street travel agent) and a “transport” team because they’d won a haulage company.

    Over the course of a period of three years they’d “gone vertical”. It sounded great  and each quarter they’d meet and discuss which new customers and prospects would sit in which of the new vertical teams they’d created. It was always a bit of a bun fight because they didn’t win any more banks or any more travel agents or any more hauliers. So they either created new vertical teams to accommodate each new win, or they stretched their definition of a vertical so wide ( to accommodate each new account) that the vertical became a horizontal again.

    Mmmm….

    Sounds implausible doesn’t it…?

    It is happening right now and if it’s not happening in your organization then you can bet your bottom Dollar it’s happening in the company across the street and the one next to them too. In the rush pull all the focus into a vertical market, companies are losing sight of the value of their proposition.

    One bank does not a banking vertical make.

    So what’s the point?

    Start by understanding the business issue your product or service addresses, then look for the kind of operational model that generates that kind of issue, then look for the organisations that fit that profile. You may find that large numbers of these organisations all sit in small number of market sectors in which case going vertical will be appropriate. However, there’s a really good chance they won’t and “going vertical” will make you irrelevant to the vast majority of the companies in that sector.

    If you’re not careful, you end up stretching your offering and value proposition to fit the vertical market strategy you’ve imposed…that way lies oblivion…margin and market erosion and a slow and painful death. Ironic really, when you consider you went “vertical” to allow you to focus in on a niche.

    For more on segmentation and niche marketing, pick up your copy of “The Marketing Doctor’s Survival Guide”

  • How to Assess and Enhance Membership Value

    How to Assess and Enhance Membership Value

    There are many areas of common interest among member-based organizations, especially now, but the largest and longest running area of concern is certainly finding and keeping members for the long term. Its the bread and butter, the engine of any organization, forming the reason for being, driving strategic direction, drawing stable revenue, and creating the nucleus of the organization that gives it its ideological center. But how do you present that value proposition to both new and existing members in a way that keeps them engaged and involved, year after year?

    It is a question that is raised constantly in roundtable discussions among non-profit executives, and one we see in our practice perennially, as new budgets are set, statistics from the prior year are examined and goals are derived. Unfortunately, there is no single easy answer, as each organization has its own unique value proposition, its own character based on the membership in aggregate, and each should be assessed on a case-by-case basis. Fortunately, there are some common areas that can be reviewed and measured, and some relatively easy fixes that can be put in place at minimal cost that will yield results both short and long term.

    The most obvious area in which to start your retention effort is an investigation into what you really know about your members. Almost to a man, if you interview senior executives at a non-profit, they will tell you know they “know” their members well, know what they want and what they need, what will attract them to the organization. Yet if you delve a little deeper, ask when they last surveyed their members about the organization itself, about how their individual lives and businesses have changed, how their needs have shifted, how they’d like to receive information, you’ll almost invariably find that the executives view and the reality do not connect completely. There’s general agreement, surely, for any good Executive Director knows the basics of their members and their respective businesses. However, the speed with which things change, not only in the members’ lives and business circumstances, but in the media and communications arena, regarding content delivery and outreach methods, make it necessary to accelerate your rate of member surveys and research by nearly double the typical rate, in order to stay current. Flexibility and adaptation are the keys to survival, and to make the right moves, you have to have good recent data.

    [pullquote align=”left or right”]…each organization has its own unique value proposition, its own character based on the membership in aggregate, and each should be assessed on a case-by-case basis.[/pullquote]

    Once you’ve decided to craft an updated survey, creating the most revealing questions, limiting them in number and complexity to reduce abandonment and boost response, and deciding the most reasonable and appropriate delivery method are some issues that must be dealt with. There is a balance that must be struck between gathering a comprehensive data set, and gathering enough responses to make the resulting data statistically significant. Too few questions and too little data and its a wasted effort. Too long a survey to get the most data yields too few responses and the reliability of the data suffers.

    Most surveys on a single issue or two are kept to ten questions to boost response. More in-depth total member surveys can be double or triple that, but at that length, delivery methods must be considered, as does the question of incentives. A short survey can be delivered in an e-mail, posted on a website, or set up via an independent web-based services, like Zoomerang. Longer, multi-page surveys don’t pull as well using online methods, and the incentives typically delivered through online surveys, including coupons and links to other sites etc, are typically not powerful enough to drive the response levels you’ll need to make good decisions. The abandonment rate is too high on a long online survey, and you might burn a bridge to your members or customers if you insist on delivering such a document in this manner. More lengthy surveys are often best delivered by old-fashioned snail mail, and include a more valuable incentive to spur response.

    Your list of recipients is also important. It may seem obvious that you include all current members on such a survey, to get a sizable enough number of responses, but there are other constituents that should also receive a survey, and in some cases the questions should be tailored to their status. Expired members who didn’t renew, those in arrears, a sampling of prospects, those with no participation in a committee, project or who haven’t  purchased anything from the organization in over two years, each should have a slightly different coded survey, one that collects information about the value to the organization, their current business situation, and their needs and preferences.

    [pullquote align=”left or right”]There is a balance that must be struck between gathering a comprehensive data set, and gathering enough responses to make the resulting data statistically significant.[/pullquote]

    Once these issues are worked out, the survey delivered and the data collected, the results should be analyzed in a number of different ways. With no baseline data to work from if this is the first comprehensive survey in more than two years, this data constitutes the best information you have, but won’t be useful in spotting trends or sensing shifts in perception or preferences. It can still be used to craft strategy and policy, and to present enticing value to current and future members.

    One of the more important questions is one regarding communications preferences. If you are trying to communicate value to your members, you have to have a good idea how they’d like to receive that information. This question will also give you a secondary reading on the technology adoption curve location of your members. If a majority of members would prefer e-mail or other web-based vehicles, your members are moving toward the center of the electronic media adoption curve, and is a good indication that they will continue to develop at a pace commensurate with the national average. This metric may correlate well to the average age of your member. Older members are typically behind the curve, both due to lack comfort and educational opportunity, and to the expense associated with high-speed internet access.

    Any way you conduct the research, the best policy is to BELIEVE THE DATA. If you’ve gone to the trouble and expense of polling your members and associated constituents as to their needs and preferences, you should at least have faith in the data. If the data goes against your “gut” feeling about members, or trends away from the direction you suspected through anecdotal evidence, it may have been too long since these impressions were formed.

    If you found this article valuable and informative, don’t forget to pick up your copy of “The Marketing Doctor’s Survival Notes

  • Consultants Offer Flexibility, Hands-Off Productivity

    Consultants Offer Flexibility, Hands-Off Productivity

    With staff sizes and budgets restricted or diminishing, and top executives up and down the ladder under pressure to do more with less each year, many savvy executives are seeking help among the seeming army of consultants of every stripe to get their companies on the profitability track. Are they finding success down that road?

    The idea of the consultant is ancient – Egyptian kings and pharaohs had “consultants” with specialized magical talents to advise them and point them in the right direction when governing the masses. King Tutankhamun had one of the greatest PR consultants ever seen, who told him that to the Egyptian people, big buildings mean big power, big statues mean big power – and Tut and other Pharaohs took this to heart and built the pyramids of Giza and other wonders of the ancient world.

    Consultants can be used for a variety of purposes, from adding moral support in difficult or uncomfortable political situations, to adding credibility to pet projects in communicating them to Boards or subordinates. The image of the unfamiliar man with the briefcase and the air of confidence in the boss’s office was born out of some particularly sticky board meetings in the 1960s by top executives at a large conglomerate who’s ideas were not being communicated effectively or credibly, and a CEO who’s head was on the block. Once the Board members heard the same message in a different way coming from the consultant, an expert in such matters, they approved the plan and the CEO was spared. The consultant in that case didn’t come up with the idea, he simply communicated it effectively and lent his credibility to the idea. This practice continues today with great success in companies and organizations across America. Communication by proxy can be used as an effective strategy if a number of conditions are met. One is that the idea or issue must have real merit on its own. A bad idea is a bad idea, no matter who presents it. Another condition is that the consultant be at least as credible as the staffer to the selected audience. He should be a known, or at least vetted, quantity, with the credentials to back it up. Once those two elements are in place, communication by proxy can be effective in getting new ideas implemented.

    Short Term Expertise

    Consultants have many other functions as well, and most departments within the organization can find a number of consultants that specialize in their particular areas of functionality to assist them. Sometimes consultants can simply be used as additional manpower, fill-ins for key employees on personal leave, plug-ins providing necessary functionality on short notice for the short term. These are not temps you can call in for a day or two while someone is out with the flu. They are highly-trained, experienced executives who have been in many different corporate situations and reached a level of comfort with the commonalities in procedures in their area between companies to be effective quickly. They are typically not used in situations where the term is shorter than a month, as the cost of lost opportunity for a stint that short drives the hourly rate beyond the return value. Expectations in this situation are relatively high, as the consultant is being asked to step into any number of situations already in place and under way, and gather sufficient information from internal sources to keep these projects moving forward effectively, in a very short period of time, but without injecting much of their own influence or changing the direction of the project. This is a tough gig, and successful consultants are to be highly prized and respected for this set of skills that make such performance not only possible but routine. When projects are critical, and the schedule is inflexible for any number of reasons, this may be a good option for mid-size to large organizations.

    “Special” Projects

    Some organizations use consultants as outboard manpower to plan and implement special projects outside the normal scope of the department or organization, or for projects that are of vital concern to the organization’s success but only come up rarely. Changing membership databases for a non-profit organization is a prime example of this type of consultant use. An IT or Association Consultant who has been through many such changeovers and data conversions can be an invaluable resource for such a critical undertaking that most organizations only face every few years. Hiring a consultant under such circumstances will expand and extend the organization’s scope of expertise for a short period, and take advantage of specialized knowledge that isn’t needed on a regular basis. The expense of the consultant is far outweighed by the savings gained by avoiding a misstep in the process and crippling your organization, however temporarily, while the problem is investigated and fixed. The consultant can prevent you from making a poor purchasing decision, and mitigates buyer’s remorse by making the correct match between user and product.

    [pullquote align=”left or right”]King Tutankhamun had one of the greatest PR consultants ever seen, who told him that to the Egyptian people, big buildings mean big power, big statues mean big power – and Tut and other Pharaohs took this to heart and built the pyramids of Giza and other wonders of the ancient world.[/pullquote]

    Sometimes that special project requires some specialized expertise in order to allow a “pet” project to be executed properly, and that expertise doesn’t exist in house. If time is a factor, and there’s no time for internal staff to develop that type or level of expertise, a consultant can be an excellent solution. The can work directly with your internal staff, provide the expertise necessary to move the project forward effectively, by-pass the internal chain of command and the inherent internal politics, and propel the project to a successful conclusion quickly and effectively.

    Guidelines

    There are some guidelines to keep in mind when using a consultant for this purpose.

    • When planning to include a consultant in the mix, be sure to make “room” for them both in the budget and in the schedule. There will be some initial ramp up, no matter how short, as they learn to work with the particular in-house players, and assess their individual capabilities. Leave a reasonable time for them to get acclimated and figure out who’s who in your organization.
    • Depending on the type of project, the consultant has been hired to provide expertise, advice and specialized services. This often requires change from the status quo, introduction of new ideas, and some assessment of the internal strengths and weaknesses on the team. Take the advice and ideas you’re given and make the most of it. Putting up roadblocks, creating obstacles, withholding information, and rejecting ideas out of hand are all a waste of time and money. You’ve hired him or her as an expert, treat them as such, and listen to them.
    • When planning to use a consultant, build into your plan sufficient staff time to manage the consultant, and the money in the budget to implement the ideas they introduce. You’ve hired an expert, but if you don’t leave room in the budget to put into practice the concepts they introduce, you’ve only done half the job. Even if you don’t keep the consultant in the picture during the implementation, you still need to fund the project sufficiently to be successful.

     

    Most good consultants in most fields have learned to work with a bare minimum of supervision or management. If you carefully outline the goals for the project, introduce them effectively to the internal staff, and provide the resources and the communication pathway for them to get accurate, unvarnished answers to questions quickly, they will take the ball and run with it. In order to keep them from veering too far from what you envision a success to be, some check-ins or milestones for approval should be built into the project schedule. That way you can adjust the course at critical junctures before they go too far off the map. Too many of these can erode the effectiveness of the consultant and doom the project, so avoid the temptation to micro manage. You had the foresight to hire them, now let them do their thing. Too few milestones can lead to some surprises, when the end of the project approaches and the final product is not what you envisioned and you don’t know why. A happy medium and a light touch usually lead to a successful outcome.

    [pullquote align=”left or right”]When planning to use a consultant, build into your plan sufficient staff time to manage the consultant, and the money in the budget to implement the ideas they introduce.[/pullquote]

     

     

    Finances

    The financial arrangements for consultants vary to some degree, depending upon the industry, the scope and duration of the project, and the nature of the organization. Many work on an hourly rate, which are standardized to some degree based on what the market will bear for the size of the projects, the area of expertise, the reputation of the consultant, and the geographic area. A Human Resources Consultant will likely charge a small company in Tennessee less per hour for a candidate search than a large company in New York City, and the company’s expectations and needs will likely differ as well. The rate can be negotiated up front, before the project starts, and the terms are often outlined in a binding legal contract. Most Boards insist on such a document in one form or another, to help provide the company some recourse and some protection for both parties should outcome turn out to be less than expected.

    Some consultants in certain industries work on a fixed project fee. This is negotiated up front as well, once the scope and extent of their involvement and the size of the project has been agreed upon. A contract is often required for this arrangement as well, with some contracts including an incentive bonus for successful or early completion or for staying under established budget guidelines. On rare occasion, a consultant will work on a contingency, similar to a tort or personal injury attorney. Especially in forensic financial work, collections, auditing, or tax work, these arrangements exist where the consultant’s fee or payment is tied either directly or indirectly to the money they are able to recover or save the company.

    No matter what the arrangement, no matter what the industry, selecting which consultant to work with is a critical step to a successful outcome. A recommendation from a colleague who has used someone for a similar project is a great start. Other sources include your local Chamber of Commerce, and industry-specific trade publication editors. The local College or University department most closely aligned with your industry is also a good source of “experts” in your selected field. Once you’ve gathered a few names, a brief phone interview is always a good idea. That alone can whittle the field down to two or three suitable candidates. Their availability, and responsiveness will give you an idea as to what they will be like to work with on your project, and you can prepare some industry specific questions to ask, to see how close to your industry and your project they are currently. Once these are complete, a personal interview is in order. This will give you an even better idea as to the character of your candidates and their capabilities. Each candidate should furnish a list of client references, and they should be rigorously checked before making a decision.

    Once a decision is made, financial arrangements can be made, and your project can begin.

    Consultants can be a vital part of your organization, expanding your capabilities, allowing you flexibility in staffing to meet short term needs, and let you take advantage of expertise beyond the level you are able to train in house. Used wisely and strategically, consultants can help you meet goals, complete new projects, grow your organization and function more efficiently and profitably.

    If you found this helpful or insightful and would like to read more, subscribe tot his blog today! Don’t forget to pick up your copy of “The Marketing Doctor’s Survival Notes